-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- April 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
-
Join 32 other subscribers
Monthly Archives: March 2018
OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: The Very Real Tendency of Federal Courts to Render Unconstitutional Opinions
(Photo Credit – FreakingNews.com) by Diane Rufino, March 26, 2018 We are all used to the accusations that a certain Executive Action is unconstitutional or a federal law is unconstitutional, and we are used to challenges to them in federal … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged activist courts, activist judges, Diane Rufino, federal judiciary, gay marriage, gay marriage decision, judicial activism, judicial courts, liberal judges, liberal justices, Obergefell, Obergefell dissent, Obergefell v. Hodges, progressive judges, progressive justices, Supreme Court, Thomas Jefferson, unconstitutional, unconstitutional court decisions, unconstitutional court opinions, unconstitutional supreme court opinions
Leave a comment
OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: The Scathing Dissent by Chief Justice John Roberts Explains Why the Majority Opinion Was an Abuse of Judicial Power Under the US Constitution
by Diane Rufino, March 16, 2018 “If you are among the many Americans—of whatever sexual orientation—who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged activist court, activist judges, Article III, Chief Justice John Marshall, Chief Justice John Roberts, conservative judges, Constitution, Diane Rufino, federal courts, federal judiciary, gay marriage, John Marshall, judicial activism, judicial overreach, judicial tyranny, Justice Alito, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, liberal judges, living breathing document, Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v Maryland, Obergefell, Obergefell decision, Obergefell dissent, Obergefell opinion, Obergefell v. Hodges, original intent, originalism, progressive judges, strict construction, Supreme Court, Thomas Jefferson, unconstitutional, unconstitutional decision, unconstitutional opinion, unconstitutional supreme court decision
Leave a comment
Ignoring the Facts, Americans Still Believe They Live in a Free Country
by Diane Rufino, March 22, 2018 How many times have you said to someone “We live in a free country?” How many times have you commented “Thank God we live in a free country.” How many times have you heard … Continue reading
Why the Cherokees Sided With the Confederacy in 1861
(Excerpted from Mike Scruggs’ book, THE UN-CIVIL WAR; Chapter 8: “The Cherokee Declaration of Independence”) Most Americans have been propagandized rather than educated on the causes of the War Between the States (aka, The War of Northern Aggression; aka, The … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Cherokee, Cherokee Declaration of 1861, Cherokee Declaration of Independence, Cherokee Nation, Cherokees, Civil War, Confederacy, confederate states, constitutitional violations, Declaration of Independence, despotism, Diane Rufino, Lawrence Scruggs, Lincoln, Lincoln's constitutional violations, Mike Scruggs, northern aggression, right of self-determination, right of self-government, southern independence, The Un-Civil War, war of northern aggression, war to prevent southern independence
Leave a comment
Phillips v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission: Will the Supreme Court Leave the First Amendment Intact?
Photo: Taken by Diane Rufino on December 5, 2017, of Jack Phillips and his attorney, Kristin Waggoner, outside the Supreme Court building after Oral Arguments. by Diane Rufino, March 9, 2018 We’ve all heard of the case of the Christian … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged ADF, Alliance Defending Freedom, cake artist, Christian baker, Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, compelled speech, compelled speech doctrine, custom wedding cakes, David Cole, Diane Rufino, discrimination, Federick Yarger, first amendment, Free Exercise, free expression, free speech, freedom of religion, gay marriage, gay rights, General Noel Francisco, Jack Phillips, Justice Kennedy, Kristin Waggoner, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Obergefell, oral arguments, Phillips v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, religious liberty, Ryan T. Anderson, same-sex, same-sex marriage, Supreme Court, traditional marriage, wedding cakes
Leave a comment